About the pathway data
Intensity Calculations
Intensity indicators (e.g., emission intensity, energy intensity) are derived from primary indicators provided by the original pathways. While foundational indicators are calibrated against historical data, users should note that numerator and denominator activity records often originate from different data sources, and some quantities carry wide historical uncertainties. These methodological differences and data variability may produce occasional variations in historic intensity values. We maintain transparency about these limitations to support informed interpretation. Underlying primary indicators are available in the "Key Assumptions" panels and Data Explorer.
Pathway Objectives
The Systemic Climate Pathways based on Integrated Assessment Models are developed to answer specific, often divergent, research questions, typically emerging from model comparison studies involving multiple Integrated Assessment Models. Because these pathways address distinct research objectives, their settings and outcomes reflect different trajectories for the target-setting indicators provided in this Navigator.
Many pathways adopt a globally cost-optimal approach to mitigation, prioritizing efficiency without explicitly incorporating equity considerations across countries and regions. These illustrate where mitigation actions are most cost-effective from a global perspective, though realizing them equitably would require international climate financing.
Several key global scenario studies in the ensemble focus on specific topics:
- Scenarios from the ENGAGE project explore a wide range of peak warming vs overshoot climate targets (Riahi et al. 2021) and another study from the same project studied the impact of institutional capacity on feasibility of achieving climate targets (Bertram et al. 2024).
- Scenarios from the NAVIGATE project focus on demand-side strategies for the buildings and transport sectors (van Heerden et al. 2025),
- The SHAPE scenarios explore different ways to achieve broad sustainable development (Soergel et al. 2024).
- The GENIE scenarios whether carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies can enable more regional fairness and feasibility in mitigation scenarios (Gidden et al. 2023).
- The NGFS Phase V scenarios aim to cover a wide range of physical and transition risk for financial stability analysis (Richters et al. 2024).
Regional Definitions and Coverage
Regional definitions vary across all pathways from differens source. While Systemic Climate Pathways from Integrated Assessment Models aim for global comprehensiveness, most sectoral products cover only select jurisdictions (e.g. G20 countries or World). This results in a patchwork of regional definitions and coverage across the Navigator. Systenmic Climate Pathways are available at a comparable level of 10 IPCC macro-regions (IPCC AR6 WGIII Annex II) and at the native resolutions of each model. Sectoral decarbonization pathways are provided at the resolutions specified in each product, varying by sector.
Emission Scopes
The Navigator distinguishes between:
- Direct emissions: From fossil fuel combustion within each sector.
- Process emissions: Non-fossil fuel emissions arising from industrial processes, such as cement and steel production.
- Indirect emissions: Emissions from the production of electricity, heat, and hydrogen from fossil fuels, allocated to end-use sectors based on projected consumption.
Emissions are reported for CO₂ alone or for all greenhouse gases (Kyoto gases: CO₂, CH₄, N₂O, HFCs, PFCs, SF₆). Sectoral Decarbonization Pathways cover different scopes and gas combinations. For Systemic Climate Pathways, we have calculated multiple scope variations where underlying data permitted.
Pathway Validation
Scenarios Compass validates climate pathways against recent observations (emissions, energy use, land use) through 2025. Many IPCC AR6 pathways did not pass validation for the Scenarios Compass, primarily due to assumptions about faster policy implementation than observed. Further information at: www.scenarioscompass.org and doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8891091/v1
Additional data availability
More granular data for Sectoral Decarbonization Pathways are available in original sources. CRREM building sector pathways contain additional country-level detail. IEA offers more detailed sectoral data (commercially licensed). Systemic Climate Pathways from Scenarios Compass and IPCC AR6 have additional variables in original databases.
Sectoral Decarbonization Pathways
The following Sectoral Decarbonization Pathways are included in the Navigator. Please use the citations below when referencing these datasets.
Teske, S., Niklas, S., Talwar, S. et al. (2022)
SN Appl. Sci. 4, 125 (2022). OneEarth Climate Model (OECM).
Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
References
Bertram, Christoph, Elina Brutschin, Laurent Drouet, et al. (2024)
Nature Climate Change, August 12, 1-7.
Gidden, Matthew J., Elina Brutschin, Gaurav Ganti, et al. (2023)
Environmental Research Letters 18 (7): 074006.
Heerden, Rik van, Oreane Y. Edelenbosch, Vassilis Daioglou, et al. (2025)
Nature Energy, February 5, 1-15.
Riahi, Keywan, Christoph Bertram, Daniel Huppmann, et al. (2021)
Nature Climate Change 11 (12): 12.
Richters, Oliver, Elmar Kriegler, Alaa Al Khourdajie, et al. (2024)
Version 4.2. Zenodo, March 13.
Soergel, Bjoern, Sebastian Rauner, Vassilis Daioglou, et al. (2024)
Environmental Research Letters 19 (12): 124009.
